The white group has done the ridiculous in only a party of glass of the king

The Madrid alleged that the Cádiz could not report for being of Second B

The Madrid alleged that the Cádiz could not report for being of Second B

Published:11/12/2015 - 11:41h

Updated:

Tickets for FC Barcelona matches

The Committee of Appeal has been the same of hard of what went the Committee of Competition to the hour to disassemble the arguments of the Real Madrid and ratify the elimination of the group merengue of the Glass of the King 2015-16. Besides, it leaves in very bad position to the Delegate, Chendo

Ticket - Gone in FC Barcelona vs Betis - League J17
The Classical - Gone in / Ticket FC Barcelona vs Real Madrid
Ticket - Gone in for all the parties of the FC Barcelona

The Real Madrid does not win for discontents in the last weeks. While the sportive situation of the ones of Rafa Benítez seems to have stabilised with the last consecutive triumphs of the combined white, fruit of the need imperante of reenganchar to some very disillusioned fans, the true is that in the dispatches and the field extradeportivo the club of Florentino Pérez follows losing the battle. After this past Thursday the French Federation confirmed that it will leave to summon to Karim Benzema with the selection "bleu" until they resolve his problems with the Justice, does few hours has been the Committee of Appeal the one who has given a new slap of reality to the merengues, ratifying the expulsion of the Glass of the King 2015-16.

In a report of more than 11 pages, Appeal desarticula one by one all the points of the resource presented by the Real Madrid and speech that the club of Florentino Pérez bases it everything in conjectures, remembering besides that the Delegate, in this case Chendo, is the main manager that the players are in statutory conditions to play. On the subject of the personal notification of the sanction to Cheryshev, Appeal says the following: "The personal notification can make through the club or SAD to the that belong in each moment, "being valid to all the effects"".

"That is to say, to effects of personal notification, the headquarters of the club is the domicile of the player. The recurrent elevates to the in fact tested category something that are not more than mere conjectures, insisting in that the club Villarreal did not move the notification to the player sanctioned, and neither to the Real Madrid CF when this recovered, in the following season, the availability of the sanctioned. Neither it is tested neither although it went it could affect to the tested demonstration that the notification did properly, as it accredits the fax that have quoted, directed to the club that it depended".

It adds in the document, besides, that "when the recurrent club speech of the absence of fault by his part and remembers that, as anybody argues, the fault is foundation inexcusable of the penalizing right, is forgetting precisely that omitted his diligence owed when it presented to the player Cheryshev for the meeting with the Cádiz Cf. If the Villarreal CF, the player or the own RFEF communicated or no to the Real Madrid the sanction imposed to Denis Cheryshev is something that lacks importance in the disciplinary type of undue alignment, as it neither is notable (from does more than two decades) the good or bad faith of the subjects interviniente".

The Committee of Appeal criticises of this form the work of Chendo like Delegate of the club: "The General Regulation of the RFEF establishes that in the preliminary of each party the referee will examine the licences that enable to each one of the players that go to be ranged, and that will present him the respective Delegate of the club, what imposes to this the do manager that, in each meeting, the players that presents are in statutory conditions that allow him do it, between them the nonexistence of sanction that prevent it to him, responsibility that the recurrent club omitted in the day of the meeting of eliminatory of Glass with the club denouncer".

The Cádiz himself could report


And, after the Real Madrid protested that the Cádiz could not report by the fact to be of Second Division B, the Committee of Appeal leaves it very clear: "it Is more, if the interpretation of the article 24 CD, second paragraph, that posits the Real Madrid CF, prospered, would result that the clubs of First Division never could be reported by a club of Second Division "B" or of Second Division, by cause of undue alignment, to the not forming part of what the Real Madrid CF considers "group", that is to say, only First Division".

"Of this luck would be planting to the clubs of Second and Second "B" Division in situation desfavorable regarding the ones of First and vulneraría even the article 14 of the Spanish Constitution, that consecrates the right to the equality of those who find in the same situation. And it is more, the clubs of First Division could make undue alignments that, to tenor of the theory of the recurrent, could not be reported and would remain impunes".

Next match of FC Barcelona

La Liga | Jornada 9
Eibar
FC Barcelona

Eibar - FC Barcelona

Saturday, 19 of October of 2019 13:00h
Estadio Municipal de Ipurua
Buy tickets
Calendar FC Barcelona
Today highlights

Most read