The formula of the fans for the rotations of the FC Barcelona

It does some days, just after the defeat suffered by the FC Barcelona against the Celtic of Vigo, launch a survey in which we wanted to ask to the fans culé what seemed him the rotations that is carrying out Luis Enrique this season 2016-17 in the Barça, when having of a big basic wardrobe to use it when the situation require it.

The case is that it is very easy to take out negative conclusions to past bull, but even so we wanted to know the posture of the fans culé, and which would be his formula to have frescos to the main players of the team and, at the same time, that the competitive rhythm do not wane along the campaign.

The answer was clear: 8,5% would do rotations of way comedida, of one or two players by party, whereas so only 0,5% showed adherent to do big rotations in almost each party of consecutive way. 4% thinks that they would have to play always the best players in the eleven headline and, from here, do changes in the second halves and, finally, the big majority of the fans -87%- thinks that never they would have to make rotations in the important parties.

And the one of the Celtic of Vigo in Balaídos was it, taking into account that the FC Barcelona already had fallen defeated by 4-1 the previous season. Then, it was really necessary to leave to any of the best in the bench? In the alignment title were present Jeremy Mathieu, André Gomes and Rafinha Alcántara, three footballers that were shipwrecked in Vigo and that did not go more than spectrums that fell inside the vorágine celestial.

The drop of Leo Messi, besides, would have to have planted like fixed player to Andrés Iniesta in the medullary, from the beginning and not going in in the second half. Everything changed with the one of Fuentealbilla in the left-handed interior, endowing of depth to his and erigiéndose in the engine of the team. 

It can not customise the defeat in an only person and neither has to demonizar to Luis Enrique by his decisions, as like boss that is he is the one who loads with the defeat and afterwards no reluce in the victory. The Asturian has sufficient credit not to be signalled then , besides, very analysed his decisions from the logical point of view, everything has a why. In spite of everything, true is also that the rotations could have not been so drastic in Balaídos... Or different.