The Feddal penalty that the VAR did not give and unworthy of Real Madrid

The Real Madrid​ could not win to the Real Betis this past Saturday in Santiago Bernabéu. The whites began well and dominating to the verdiblancos, but little by little lost spark and the Andalusians grew in the party. The ones of Zinedine Zidane had several clear opportunities to mark, but went back to condemn them the fault of tarpaulin.

The merengues left to happen of this form an opportunity of gold to go back to plant like leaders of LaLiga. The prick of the FC Barcelona in Raise opened them the doors to go back to put first, but the madridistas were not to the height. In spite of the disappointment that supposed his team, the madridismo clama against the VAR by a penalti that no pitó.

They remained ten minutes for the end of the meeting when Karim Benzema put a centre to the area that Zou Feddal cut with the hand. The referee did not see at all or, if it saw it, had to think that it was involuntary because no pitó at all. The VAR reviewed the played during some seconds and communicated him to the referee that the party could continue on its course.

The hand was evident, although, to trial of the room VOR and of the referee of the crash, was not as for pitar maximum penalty. Feddal Was to the floor to cut the played and pulled the arm before supporting it against the floor. It was then when it touched the ball and avoided that the centre of Benzema could arrive to any mate inside the area.

The norm is garbled and the Madrid complained for that

According to the new norm, if the hand find in the floor or in a natural position is not penalti, but the madridismo understands that when the balloon touches the hand of the central is not in lawn, but in the air. Emilio Butragueño complained after the meeting of this penalti no pitado and asked explanations to the referees and to the VAR.

"This played specifically, in which the balloon strikes the hand and interrupts the played... We are garbled because it takes the decision. The hand interrupts the played and do not know why the decisions go in a direction and afterwards inothers . We understood that the VAR went to resolve this type of situations, but no", aimed the director of Institutional Relations of the Madrid.

Sergio Bouquets did not show so critical and preferred to forget of the played, since now it is impossible that change the result of the same. "I have seen that there was contact and gave him in the hand, but the interpretation is of the referee and are they those that decide, neither is necessary to stand out it more because it no longer serves of at all", affirmed. It was as it was, the Madrid empató and left to happen the occasion to put leader.