DECISIVE IN THE MEXICO-RUSSIA
More reactions to the VAR: "it Is well but it is an agony"
Published:24/06/2017 - 18:05h
Updated:25/06/2017 - 01:25h
The FIFA goes on with the implantation of the videoarbitraje, and the system VAR follows generating opinions of all type by his revolution in the arbitration. The last in pronouncing , the seleccionador of Mexico, that considers it últil but also an agony
The parties of Glass Confederations are showing that the initiative of the FIFA to implant the system of videoarbitraje was a good solution, but that will carry time adapt to the changes that the technology produces in the parties. The last in thinking on the system VAR was Juan Carlos Osorio, trainer of the selection of Mexico, after his clash against the hostess of the tournament, Russia.
"Today we carry us the worst part with the goal cancelled, but against Portugal favoured us, finishes equating", explained the technician, that however aimed that "it seems me that by Fair Play is well, but is an agony every time that the referee goes to the screen to corroborate the played, in this part suffers enough".
The party between Mexico and Russia, that certified the advance of the American selection to the semifinals and the elimination of the Europeans of the competition, was marked again by the use of the VAR, that served to confirm the decision of no pitar a penalti favourable to the combined Russian and cancel by offside a goal that had given to Héctor Moreno.
Leadership in the Confederations
The Glass Confederations is the first championship of absolute selections that includes the presence of the videoarbitraje, and the system is being decisive in the majority of the parties. During the competition, the referees have resorted to the repetitions to cancel decisive goals, as it occurred him to Portugal, and tambien have given and removed during the clashes, as Edu Vargas, that saw like the VAR cancelled him a goal and gave him another in the same meeting.