Eden Hazard and Ousmane Dembélé compete for being the worst signing

THE INJURIES ARE HURTING BOTH

SURVEY: Which signing has been more disappointing, Dembélé or Hazard?

Published:23/02/2020 - 18:07h

Updated:23/02/2020 - 18:48h

Madrid and Barça spent a million on Eden Hazard and Ousmane Dembélé, but neither is meeting expectations. The injuries have ballasted them and they are not being able to play. Which signing is being more disappointing?

Tickets for FC Barcelona matches

The FC Barcelona bet everything by Ousmane Dembélé in the summer of 2017 and spent 105 million euros more other 40 in variables by him. The French was one of the big promises of the world of the football when it landed in the Camp Nou and had put a lot of hopes in him. Two years and half afterwards can say that it has not fulfilled with the expectations that raised by fault of his irregularity and, especially, of his muscular problems.

In the Real Madrid also went with everything to by Eden Hazard this past summer to try fill the gap that left Cristiano Ronaldo in 2018. The Belgian carries years being the big star of Chelsea and one of the best footballers of the world, but had to show it in a giant like the white group. It cost 100 'kilos' more 40 in bonus and, up to now, has not been able to show if the voucher. This past Saturday went back to lesionarse and practically will lose what subtracts of course.

THE POLL Hazard Or Dembélé, which of the two has been worse signing?

In 'FCBN' want to ask to our readers if it has been worse signing the one of Dembélé or the one of Hazard, since both have had the same problems of injuries from his arrival to Madrid and Barcelona. The two cost more or less the same and arrived to relieve to two big stars (Neymar Jr and Cristiano), and so much the one like the another have lost the present campaign almost to the complete by his physical problems.

In spite of the a lot of similarities that have both players, also there are several things that differentiate them. For example, Dembélé arrived like a very promising promise and still is very young and has time of revertir the situation. In the case of the Belgian is distinct, since it has arrived to Santiago Bernabéu in his cénit and has fulfilled 29 years recently. The ex 'blue' is going in in the final stages of his career and in Madrid already have lost a whole year of his football.

The two leave a lot of doubts

Pay more than 100 millions by somebody that, in spite of disappointing up to now, still can triumph ten years in the club, can be defendible. But, it is defendible spend this money in a footballer that will go in in the treintena in 2021 and to the that, besides, remained him only a year of agreement? That is the debate that leave you to the readers. The feelings that has left Hazard being healthy are very good, but to the reality is that his first year in Madrid will happen it to him in white and could not to remain him more than two or three more to the maximum level.

Also it is necessary to signal that, looking to the future, the problems of Dembélé are much more worrisome that the ones of Eden. The French has not left of recaer of muscular injuries that prevent him take rhythm, whereas the madridistas has suffered two fissures of ankle by two patadas. The ones of the ex of Chelsea is, therefore, haphazard, whereas the of the Frenchman could be chronic, if it does not do something to remedy it. Only the time will say which of the two has been a more disappointing signing.

Next match of FC Barcelona

La Liga | Jornada 30
Sevilla
FC Barcelona

Sevilla - FC Barcelona

Sunday, 5 of April of 2020 No time
Estadio Ramón Sánchez-Pizjuán
Buy tickets
Calendar FC Barcelona
Today highlights

Most read