The juridical services of the Barça defend to the Neymar

When it has known that the judge Of Kills it has rchazado the resources presented by the family Neymar after reopening the "Case Neymar 2", the Barça has given his support to the player in the "incongruences" inside the "Case DIS". The Barcelona juridical services defended to the player and his family in the Magazine Barça in an article titled "The incongruences of the Case DIS".

"It is not possible to describe the operation like corruption between individuals, neither of swindle, because Neymar was not forced to play where said him DIS or the Saints", can read in the antetítulo. Later, the lawyers culés launched several defences and comparisons between the deal of the players in the current world and "a sack of wheat".

The National High Court equates to a player with an object

In fact they employ a sentence that did popular the president of the FIFA in the years 50 Jules Rimet when it affirmed that "it is necessary to go with a lot of care because the football is turning into a business". "The Spanish courts have been the stage where have materialised the fears of Jules Rimet when deciding the Fiscalía of the National High Court that the contracting of a player turns into reality in an operation equiparable on sale of wheat or on sale of a car, since it has given letter of nature to any price to the pressures of a company that has by object the commercialisation of economic rights of the players of football (...)".

In conclusion, and to "translate to the language of the mortal juridical concepts very technical", clear both crimes of has been them accused the Barça:

"To) Corruption between individuals, that is to say, the acceptance by part of our player, Neymar Jr, and by part of his father and of his companies, of a determinate quantity of money of the FC Barcelona to have the option to advance his signing and, that in opinion of the Fiscalía of the National High Court prevented that other clubs could opt to the contracting of the player.

b) Swindle (in the modality of mock agreement), that is to say, the supposed conspiracy made between the FC Barcelona and Santos (...) So that, by means of the signature of determinate agreements (friendly parties, options on three players) recessed the official price of the traspaso to avoid that DIS earned the 40 percent of the amounts of these agreements".

In front of these, the juridical services of the Barcelona do three questions, all with an only answer: no. 

"1) When a club does an offer for fichar to a player, this is forced to accept this traspaso?

2) it Is odd that the clubs with tradition seller yield options on players with future of his staff?

3) The same money that has been credited to a player like wage or premium of signing can be considered at the same time a traspaso?".

Finally, they contribute some consistent conclusions to the exposed: "If nowadays somebody does not understand still that play in the FC Barcelona at the side of Messi is the reason by which all the players want to come is that it does not understand the high competition. (....) And perhaps it will be necessary to analyse the ethical level of men of proprietary businesses of investment funds that, taking advantage of of the humility of a lot of families, sign agreements that pretend a form of new slavery for the player and his family. It can be that the simplest summary in this case is that 'where give them, take them'".