{"id":146153,"date":"2025-06-06T03:52:00","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T01:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/weisetech.dev\/fc-barcelona-noticias\/en\/vitor-roque-signing-cost-barca-40-million_312962_102\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T09:30:15","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T07:30:15","slug":"vitor-roque-signing-cost-barca-40-million_312962_102","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fcbarcelonanoticias.com\/en\/transfers\/vitor-roque-signing-cost-barca-40-million_312962_102.html","title":{"rendered":"Vitor Roque’s signing cost Bar\u00e7a more than expected"},"content":{"rendered":"

The club assumed taxes that corresponded to Athletico Paranaense, raising the cost of the Brazilian forward to 40 million euros<\/h2> \r\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n Calendar of FC Barcelona <\/a>\r\n<\/div>

The signing of Vitor Roque by FC Barcelona<\/a><\/strong> not only involved an investment of 30 million euros as a transfer fee. According to the program “Bar\u00e7a Reservat” of Catalunya R\u00e0dio<\/strong><\/em>, the azulgrana club also assumed the payment of taxes that corresponded to Athletico Paranaense, raising the total cost of the operation to 40 million<\/strong>.<\/p>

Internal sources from the Bar\u00e7a<\/strong> sports area have confirmed that the club took over this fiscal surcharge, claiming that it could recover it in the future through a double taxation agreement between Spain and Brazil. However, the legal process required for this return presents risks and offers no absolute guarantees.<\/p>

Bar\u00e7a paid more than agreed for Vitor Roque<\/h2>

Although the initial agreement set the transfer of Vitor Roque at 30 million euros<\/strong>, FC Barcelona ended up also assuming the taxes derived from the operation. Specifically, the club paid the taxes that Athletico Paranaense had to pay to the Spanish Treasury, an unusual scenario in this type of international signings.<\/p>

\"Vitor<\/picture><\/a> <\/figure>

Related<\/p>

OFFICIAL: Bar\u00e7a confirm the long-awaited signing of Vitor Roque! <\/a> <\/h4> <\/div> <\/section><\/div>

This additional figure \u2014about 10 million euros<\/strong>\u2014 was not contemplated in the first official calculation of the cost of the Brazilian forward. From the club’s management, they maintain that this amount can be claimed under the double taxation agreement between both countries. However, to achieve this, it will be necessary to go to court, which introduces uncertainty about its recovery.<\/p>

Unfavorable legal precedent: the James Rodr\u00edguez case<\/h2>

The most similar precedent dates back to 2014, when AS Monaco sold James Rodr\u00edguez to Real Madrid.<\/strong> In that case, the Treasury claimed the taxes derived from the operation, and finally the Spanish justice ruled in favor of the Treasury, forcing the Monegasque club to pay the full amount.<\/p>

This precedent plays against FC Barcelona<\/strong>, as it shows that the Spanish tax authorities could maintain their criteria of imputing these taxes to selling clubs, regardless of the country of origin. If history repeats itself, Bar\u00e7a could see its attempt to recover that surcharge frustrated.<\/p>