{"id":19374,"date":"2021-01-05T12:25:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-05T11:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/weisetech.dev\/fc-barcelona-noticias\/en\/koeman-receives-backrest-continue-fc-barcelona_263796_102\/"},"modified":"2026-04-16T09:18:22","modified_gmt":"2026-04-16T07:18:22","slug":"koeman-receives-backrest-continue-fc-barcelona_263796_102","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fcbarcelonanoticias.com\/en\/fc-barcelona\/koeman-receives-backrest-continue-fc-barcelona_263796_102.html","title":{"rendered":"Koeman receives backrest to continue in the FC Barcelona"},"content":{"rendered":"
Until the moment, all the precandidatos to the presidency of the FC Barcelona have kept to the margin<\/strong> to show full confidence to Ronald Koeman<\/strong> of face to his continuity in the bench of the Barcelona group. The Dutch technician has agreement with the Bar\u00e7a until 2022<\/strong>, the same seemed not arriving to his happy term because of the disappointing results harvested by the team in what it goes of season, but the partners against all prognosis backed the continuity of his strategist.<\/p> The hero of Wembley continues being a figure respected by the barcelonismo<\/strong>, and the results of the survey of ‘MD’ were proof of this. 34,1% aimed “yes, absolutely” <\/strong>to if Koeman has to continue until the ending of his agreement, whereas 45,5% add to this “in case that the new board or the new sportive direction consider it”. This adds a total of 79,6% of the respondents that bet by the permanence<\/strong> of the Dutch. Only 17,3% of the partners do not agree with his continuity and 3,2% do not define .<\/p> If it makes a global analysis of the survey, between which back unconditionally the continuity of Koeman in the bench project the partners that consider that the Barcelona club does not need immediate changes <\/strong>and in depth, the same that they had kept the date of the elections in March and that confess to have voted by Josep Maria Bartomeu in 2015.<\/p> On the other hand, those that agreed with the continuity of Koeman if like this it decided it the new managerial board, are those adherents to advance the elections, those that had voted in favour of the motion of censorship <\/strong>and those that consider to Joan Laporta<\/a><\/strong> like the best president of the history of the club. Those that voted against Koeman stand out significantly those that think that the Bar\u00e7a needs urgent and deep changes.<\/p> Between the constituents declared of Laporta there are more adherents of the continuity of Koeman that between the ones of V\u00edctor Font<\/strong>: Laporta (“yes, absolutely” 33,9% and no 17,4%) \u2013 Font (himself 27,9% and no 27,6%). Whereas between the voters of Rousaud and Freixa<\/strong> does not exist a “no” for Koeman, both obtained the “himself” higher (42,9% and 40%).<\/p> Against all prognosis, Koeman is backed<\/h3>