Joan Laporta will offer this Monday (11:00 hours) a press conference to explain all the related with the 'case Negreira' from the official point of the FC Barcelona. Although the Barcelona president already has advanced that his statements "do not have at all because there is not at all", 'The World' insists in following bringing information on the table in the previous of the explanations of the mandator culé.

According to the newspaper, an auditor warned to the Barcelona entity in 2010 that Laporta had increased the payments to Enríquez Negreira and required him that the abonos to one of the societies of the referee's leader, Nilsad, had experienced an important increase. The information signals that the turnover of this society increased 101,9% in a season, standing out it like this in his headline in the already morning of this Monday.

A new conflict desvelado in the edge of the explanations

The concepts of this increase, according to the report of the audit, went the "recording of parties contested by the Spanish selection sub 21 and by the absolute selection in the Glass celebrated Confederations in South Africa". The document would have been delivered to the directive of the Barça grieve four months after the exit of Laporta, to the new directive headed by Sandro Rosell.

However, 'The World' stands out that in spite of these data, the payments to Negreira kept during eight years more, moment in which Negreira culminated his work in the Technical Committee of Referees. The auditor 'KPMG' was the attendant to make the reports, reviewed that the increase experienced by the company Nilsad of Negreira bent his turnover in a year under the pretext to record videos of parties.

Figures that would not fit inside what really did

Of such form that by this service happened to perceive 245.000 euros to the year to 494.000 with the club keeping a "agreement" based in the "advice of technical videos", reviews the Spanish media. By this type of reports is that The Fiscalía has considered that the turnover of Negreira is fictitious and has wanted to ascertain that his consultancys are not sustentadas by any type of documentary support.