The controversial episode that has lived the FC Barcelona in his visit to the Inter of Milan owing to the arbitration continues causing stir. From the breast of the staff, the annoyance has been more than evident, especially by the difference of the criteria applied by the referee, Slavko Vincic, in played similar, as well as by the work made from the room of videoarbitraje.
The newspaper 'Sport' has collected parts of the demonstrations of indignation by part of the same players and part of the technical body that has been present in the stadium Giuseppe Meazza. In one of these, one of the effective of the staff would have referred to the referee esloveno like "the puto referee" after his controversial work in the party.
The played more commented, beyond all doubt, have been the starred by Denzel Dumfries and Ansu Fati; both very similar in his assessment, but with distinct applications of the regulation and back sentences that finished prejudicing to the Barcelona team, that finally has gone out defeated of Italy and without being able to add in search of his classification.
Errors in the referee's criteria
In the back statements in the mixed zone, Sergi Roberto and Eric García have showed his confusion in front of the cancellation of the goal annotated by Pedri González when it had not been he the one who had touched the balloon with the hand, whereas the regulation allows that the played continue if this action produces with another distinct player to the scorer of haphazard way.
Likewise, the recurrent played in which Denzel Dumfries hit the ball with his hands and arms have been object of strong cuestionamientos, aggravated by the context in which it developed the party, with both teams playing much more that three points, as well as by the moment, already near to decree the end of the commitment in the Meazza.