The referee of the The Palms-Barcelona of this Thursday, Mateu Lahoz, wanted to have some degree of leadership to the start of the second half in the Stadium of Big Canarian, to the pitar a penalti entirely non-existent of Sergi Roberto on Aguirregaray.
Or at least this is what understood the commentators of the transmission of 'Movistar Plus', because the true is that anybody could know for sure, neither inside the field neither was, why reason Mateu Lahoz signalled the maximum penalty to instances, supposes , of one of his assistants of LaLiga.
Who committed the penalti in the FC Barcelona?
"We do not know it, we do not know it", it said Carlos Martínez, commentator of 'Movistar Plus', in repeated occasions even after seeing the repetition of the played by television. The main theory is that Mateu Lahoz signalled a slight agarrón of Sergi Roberto to Aguirregaray, the one who threw to the flat of way exaggerated to cause the maximum penalty.
The second theory is that the penalti was signalled by hands inside the area of Lucas Digne, that if they produced were totally involuntary after the attempt of finish of a player of the UD The Palms crashed in the stick and rebounded.
Mateu Lahoz Already had prejudiced to the Barça
The case is that Jonathan Calleri was the attendant to launch the penalti, and did it with a big dry shot and placed that went in near of one of the squares of the goal of Ter Stergen, without that the guardameta German could detain it in spite of the pulled.
It calls the attention, besides, that the FC Barcelona saw prejudiced by this penalti against when, at the end of the first-half, also saw affected by a played in which the guardameta of The Palms, Chichizola, cleared a balloon out of the area with the hands, without that Mateu Lahoz saw it neither therefore it admonished properly to the offender. The Barça, prejudiced with the arbitration of Mateu.