The Barcelona is doing all the pertinent accounts to close the campaign with numbers in positive. The Assembly of Compromisarios approved the sale of several active of the club with the end to be able to close the exercise of the 2021/22 and also burst into in the market estival with criterion. In spite of this, there are several pending fringes that the club follows resolving to nine days that June finish.
One of them is the renewal of Gavi. The Andalusian has been one of the most used footballers by Xavi Hernández and one of the pillars of his sportive project. With a valid agreement until 2023, his renewal is a priority for the club, because has a caché very elevated in Europe and because his clause of rescission is of hardly 50 million euros. However, there is another subject linked with the midfield player that also affects to the Barça
And it is that as it aims the newspaper 'ACE', there are 25 players of different clubs ascribed to LaLiga to which applies the 'Law Anti-Barça', that that Joan Laporta designated and reported for affecting to the team and to promises like Gavi or Pablo Tower. This rule of economic control aims that the wage of all footballer of the filial that have contested 30% of parties with the first team will be computed in the same mass salarial of the first staff.
Added to this, for the case of Pablo, that arrives from the Racing of Santander, handle other parameters in case to be included in the Barça B. In these would take in account other variables like the total wage by which has signed, the quantity of international appearances with his selection and other sportive factors that they could incremental considerably the value of his index card.
LaLiga, against the Barcelona?
Javier Thebes, president of LaLiga, thinks that the Barcelona do not have arguments because there is until 18 clubs that also are 'suffering' this rule. In fact, from the breast of the maximum organism to level of clubs of the Spanish football keep that the FC Barcelona is of the most benefited teams by the unilateral measures that are in the regulation. One of them is that they have been able to deliver in five years the losses caused by the COVID instead of computing them in a year as it was had to, what keeps 'with life' to day of today to the entity.