It does some days, from "FCBN" launch a survey in which we ask to the users of the web page on the role that is living this season in the goal of the FC Barcelona, if they thought that would have to keep or no of face to the next season and if, therefore, would opt for giving the titularity to Marc-André Ter Stegen in League BBVA. Well, of the 654 votes obtained, a total of 507 fans (77,5%) think that what would have to do Luis Enrique the next campaign is to continue with the same dynamics of goalkeepers.

They would follow betting by Claudio Bravo like fixed in the League BBVA and by Ter Stegen, simultaneously, like titling in UEFA Champions League and Glass of Rey, as it has come sucediendo during these two last seasons. Of the rest, 17,3% of the voters (113 votes) would think that the best option would be to yield to Ter Stegen already the absolute titularity in all the competitions to his 23 years, having showed the youngster guardameta German that has personality, quality and sufficient temperament as to assume the challenge.

What seems to have very clear the fans of the FC Barcelona is that no traspasaría to any of the two archers to the term of the present season, since so only 2,6% of the users (17) has opted by said option, whereas the another 2,6% would not know which option choose. In this coyuntura, seems that the most likely to these heights is that, of face to the next season 2016-17, Luis Enrique bet by the common sense and do not vary the dynamics of goalkeepers that so good results is giving since both landed.

This yes, said decision will comport an important risk, and is the unrest of Ter Stegen. The germano already has showed in more than an occasion have a lot of personality, and no descarta that, if the next season does not achieve to be indisputable headline in all the competitions, believes a difficult unsteadiness to carry in the changing room blaugrana, until the point to be able to even ask the traspaso or the cession to another club to have of the minutes wished. For the moment, in any case, said hypothesis is so only this. A speculation.