It opens a new chapter of the recurrent controversy between Real Madrid TV and the referees. In this occasion, the affine media to the cast merengue has not doubted in questioning the performance of Ricardo of Boroughs Bengoetxea in the tie 1-1 between the whites and the Seville in the Stadium Ramón Sánchez Pizjuán, where the referee was protagonist in at least three occasions.
In the referred television space have described the performance like "a sociological scandal" in reference to the statements of Joan Laporta on the 'madridismo sociological'. Aunado To this, have insinuated that the Basque judge would have to have been appointed the Most Valuable Player of the party, standing out that "Medina Cantalejo (president of the Technical Committee of Referees) and Clos Gómez (director of the project VAR) will congratulate him".
What say in 'RMTV' on the controversies of the meeting?
In relation with one of the controversial actions of the party, the goal of Fede Valverde cancelled by a supposition offside of Jude Bellingham, the program showed a taking to argue why there was not position advanced, sustaining that: "have to think that Us there is offside. The image is very clear, does not leave place to doubts". Equally, it mentioned that Jaume Roures, owner of Mediapro, commissioned to issue the images, is avalista of the FC Barcelona, insinuating possible speculations.
Finally, it did reference to the annotation cancelled to the English midfield player because of a previous fault in the played. It emphasized in that "Of Boroughs Bengoetxea decides that the played continue, but when Valverde touches the balloon, then decides to attend to the player of the Seville, Ocampos. Not even the players of the Seville understand what the referee is pitando". That concluded in that a performance like this only can understand if it analyses the record of the referee in his clashes with the Real Madrid.