New chapter of the controversial 'case Negreira'. The Real Madrid has presented this week a writing of allegations of 29 pages in front of the Provincial Audience of Barcelona, requesting the refusal of the resource presented by the FC Barcelona. Like this it informed it 'Digital Freedom', aiming that the white team argues that his personación like private prosecution is legitimate and vital to preserve the integrity of the competition.
The document of the Madrid affirms that the crime of sportive corruption protects juridical goods of which the club is headline, independently of if it has suffered an economic or sportive damage. The merengues sustain that the alteration of results of the competition could have affected to the entity, and that exist evidences of the behaviour of sportive corruption and of his gravity.
In relation with the resource presented by the Barça, the Madrid stands out that the interest in the purity of the competition is not something general and impersonal, but it can be relative to a concrete club. Equally it argues that the clubs participants of LaLiga share a worthy interest of protection in the same competition and that the performances to benefit to the Barça affect directly to this common interest, clearly in new attack from the dispatches of Santiago Bernabéu to the Barcelona team.
The Real Madrid does not leave space for the doubt on the Barça
Besides, the Madrid answers to the arguments of the Catalan group on the supposed fault of proofs, describing this defensive speech like "empty, gap and unrealistic". It signals even that the current evidences are overwhelming and refutan any allegation of insufficiency indiciaria, reaffirming his position of equality of offence in front of any criminal figure, already was sportive corruption or cohecho.
The Madrid, with Florentino Pérez in command, Insists in the legitimación active to exert the private prosecution and stands out that his personación does not put in risk the right of the investigated to a process without undue delays. Likewise, it denies the need to group private prosecutions under a same representation and defence, concludes the exclusive information of 'Digital Freedom'.