ERRORS OF THE VAR
Chance? Lenglet's penalty and Betis's penalty not whistled
Published:24/10/2020 - 20:20h
Updated:26/10/2020 - 11:44h
In the previous day, in a party between the Real Betis and the Real Sociedad, the referee no pitó penalti, after an alike action to the agarrón of Lenglet, much more evident
The Classical is one of the parties with more repercussion of the world and the one of this Saturday has not been less. A referee's decision has decided the meeting: in the conflict for winning the position inside the area, Clement Lenglet and Sergio Bouquets have held mutually and the referee has determined the maximum penalty. The action, inevitably, has remembered to a played in the Real Betis-Real Sociedad, of the past day.
In a meeting, also very controversial, the team of judges decided no pitar penalti after a clear agarrón of Him Normand on Antonio Sanabria. The referee decided not taking part in the played and expected to that this finished to listen the opinion of his mate of the room VOR. Although the T-shirt of the forward verdiblanco remained totally destripada owing to the agarrón, after the review, there was not rectification.
Very different has been the played that have been able to see today. So much the central French blaugrana like the captain of the Real Madrid, were holding in the noble dispute of a favourable space to finish the leather. In no case it can interpret that the defender is the only that commits infringement, by what the penalti did not have to be conceded. Finally, Sergio Bouquets would materialise the so much from the eleven metres.
The only conclusion that can take out of this comparison is that the referee's community is not coherent in his decisions. It does not have any sense that the agarrón of Him Normand was not admonished with yellow card and penalti and that, on the other hand, Martínez Munuerto decided, previous review of the videoarbitraje, pitar infringement in favour of the team merengue.
FC Barcelona and Real Betis, the most disadvantaged teams
Without wanting to insinuate any type of intention of desfavorecer to both teams, so much the team culé like the bético have been the two more prejudiced clubs by the referee's decisions in the first meetings of LaLiga. Perhaps, his tendency to play, during big part of the party, in the rival field, with a style of game very alike, cause more played controversial.