The Athletic of Madrid is not at all satisfied by how has carried the FC Barcelona the signing of Antoine Griezmann. It does several days decided to take out a communiqué to criticise to the Barcelona group by his management and for having negotiated with the footballer during the past season without permission of the team rojiblanco and this past Friday took out another with another claim.

The colchoneros are convinced that the barcelonistas negotiated by the leading Frenchman in the month of March and that arrived to an agreement then. By this reason, the Athletic demands that the culés have to pay the 200 million euros of clause of rescission that had the footballer by that then and no the 120 that cost from the one of July.

Enrique Cerezo, president of the group rojiblanco, has left very clear in RAC1 that if the Atleti is doing all this is because has proofs that can show that it is true what is saying. These proofs would have to be documentary on the agreement signed by Griezmann and the Barcelona engaging in March or would not have any value.

"If the club has done this communiqué is because has proofs. We have to study it and if really we have the proofs will demand the quantity that consider necessary. The Barça will act as it have to act or will defend as it have to do it", explained the maximum mandator of the team of Wanda Metropolitan on what is suing the Athletic.

Disappointed with Griezmann

Cerezo Also had words for Griezmann and explained that it feels very disappointed with him by the attitude that has had in his leave of the club. "I am disappointed by the attitude of the player because it wanted to go and no has said it to us until the last minute", affirmed the president to hint why the Atleti also has loaded against him.

The maximum mandator colchonero does not know if the Frenchman has taken the correct decision when leaving , but has clear that the Barça has hit of full with his contracting. "The Barcelona has done a big signing. We did not want that Griezmann went out but he has taken this decision and will see if it is correct or no", finalised.