SUSPICIOUS ARBITRATION IN GLASS
CONFIRMED: Double rasero of the arbitration with Barça and Madrid
Published:6/01/2017 - 02:51h
Updated:6/01/2017 - 13:38h
In hardly 24 hours, remained showed once again the double rasero existent in the Spanish football and, this week, especially in Glass. Mateu Lahoz Gave a goleada to the Real Madrid and Borbalán removed the traced back to the Barça
This past Wednesday seemed that it was written in the stars that the Real Madrid had to golear to the Seville FC in Santiago Bernabéu. Or this at least hinted the arbitration of Mateu Lahoz, that invented the two last goals of the group merengue, work of Raphael Varane and James Rodríguez, to put to the ones of Zidane with a foot and half in quarter-finals of Glass of Rey.
Well, if the Wednesday all were protests against the favouritism to the whites, this Thursday went it by several controversial decisions of Fernández Borbalán in Saint Mamés, that without place to doubts benefited to the Athletic of Bilbao and prejudiced to the FC Barcelona, preventing of this way the threaten of traced back of the culés in an always difficult field as it is The Cathedral.
Once again, it confirmed the "double " rasero" of the Spanish arbitration, at least in this round of eighth of final of Glass of Rey, to the hour to measure the played of the parties of Real Madrid and FC Barcelona. Against the Seville, the referee Mateu Lahoz invented a penalti non-existent on Modric and did not signal a previous fault in the goal of Varane.
In the Athletic-Barça, Borbalán no dignó to pitar two possible penaltis in favour of the Barça -the one of Neymar very clear-, whereas it neither saw the aggression of Aduriz to Umtiti and covered of yellow cards to the players culés for protesting.
Suspicious arbitrations that could avoid
These two arbitrations are suspicious, without place to doubts, but have like background the measures that used in the World-wide of Clubs and that in Spain, for the moment, deny to implement not to disassemble the "chiringuito".
For when the use of the repetitions of television? Why it can not use the video to decide if a played has been violent or no, although it was in the half part? And the eye of falcon that uses in tennis to know if a balloon rebasa or no the line of goal? They are questions for the moment without answer. "Then it would not be football", say some. What is not football are the injustices. And almost always they prejudice to the Barça.
