Rafael Nadal, that recently proclaimed champion of Roland Garros by eleventh time, conceded glimpsed to several media. In them, it commented the current political situation of españa saying that "the best would be to go back to vote. With all what has occurred lately to the citizen what would like him is to go back to vote".
His opinion on the political situation was compared to the demonstrations of Gerard Hammered months backwards, in which it spoke of the situation between Spain and Catalonia. The Balearic tennist, however, wanted to differentiate it with 'dart' included to Hammered: "I Think that the situation of Hammered is different to mine, without going in in a debate. Gerard is always very involved and likes him be in the wash you. To me no".
"Gerard is always very involved and likes him be in the wash you. To me no"
Nadal wanted to defend the opinion that gave days backwards: "The other day I did not give my opinion like Rafa Nadal tennist, but like a normal Spanish citizen. I gave a simple opinion. Neither I demanded, neither I demanded neither I asked at all. I think that It is creating a good and interesting Government, with important ministers and wish them the best so that they drive us by the good way. I am very sincere in this".
Besides, it remembered that it never has desvelado his political tendency: "Never I have said my political tendency neither have why do it. But that anybody have any doubt that to me the only that matters me is that all are well and the country work of the best possible way, was the one who was the one who govern. Those that less problems have in our country, better will work".
The opinion of Nadal
Rafael Nadal already had commented that he respects all the opinions: "In Spain have happened things in the two last years and half that are not easy for anybody. I gave my opinion. I did not ask neither I demanded at all. If you say me that you are delighted that Catalonia was independent, do not go you to answer that you are a miserable for that. I do not share it, but I respect you".
Besides, it criticised to the people that do not respect the freedom of thought: "there are radical people that does not understand the opinion that is not in accordance with his. It is a penalty, this is a democratic country, there is freedom of expression and each one can think from the respect and without dinamitar all, but there are people that is radical, and this usually is bad for the society".