The press coincides: The Barça was prejudiced in Saint Mamés

Hardly some hours after the controversial Athletic-FC Barcelona of eighth of final of Glass of the King 2016-17, the Spanish media take out smoke in it tocante to the controversies of the party, and to how the collegiate Fernández Borbalán benefited to the Basque group although the venues finished playing with nine men.

It is this possible? As yes, if it takes into account that Borbalán ate two penaltis in favour of the Barça and, besides, did not see at all in a clear aggression of Aduriz to Umtiti, that suffered a hit in the trachea. In case it was little, the Andalusian referee filled of yellow cards to the Barcelona by the protests, as if the culés could not defend of the referee's injustices that suffer.

The case is that the main Spanish means, and also any of the foreigner, have done echo of it sucedido in The Cathedral in the last hours, giving the reason to the barcelonismo and asking, in some cases, the implementation of the videoarbitraje carried out in the World-wide of Clubs of the FIFA.

In the capital of Spain did not give credit to the arbitration

"It would have to have signalled the penalty spot after the action of Gorka with Hammered and penalti of Etxeita to Neymar. Aduriz Had to see the red card by the aggression to Umtiti", commented the analyst of the newspaper "Marks", Andújar Oliver, whereas the Spanish newspaper asked the "technology already for the football", since "the Barcelona had to have launched two penaltis that did not signal Borbalán".

Such was the situation that even "ABC", of marked character madridista, planted of the side of the Barça. "A manotazo of Aduriz to the neck of Umtiti left noqueado to the French. The referee did not signal at all, but to see it could have been perfectly red. (...) Claro demolish of Etxeita on Neymar that caused a monumental anger of all the Barcelona players. (...). Possible penalti of Gorka on Hammered, in the minute 15. Iraizoz arrolla To the defence after the finish of east", could read in the half Madrilenian.

The newspaper "El País" also hallucinated with the sucedido: "the referee decided to absolve to Iraizoz when it demolished to Hammered and, more still, to Etxeita when it followed suit with Neymar, of form more clamorosa. In both cases indultó to the Athletic and between both indultó an aggression of Aduriz to Umtiti".

In the Basque Country and France also criticised to Borbalán

In fact, until the Basque press criticised to the referee Fernández Borbalán. "El Correo" signalled that the Athletic "had to appreciate to Fernández Borbalán that left without signalling a penalti of Etxeita to Neymar that all Saint Mamés thought that it went to pitar". "Diario Vasco", instead, opted for writing that "the referee ate an aggression of Aduriz, a penalti clear to Neymar and expelled by double yellow to Raúl García and Iturraspe. In some moments the referee hoarded more focus that the players".

Finally, in France neither could believe the arbitration of Borbalán against the FC Barcelona. "L'Équipe" spoke of "calamitoso arbitration of Fernández Borbalán", whereas in "BeIN Sports France" the narrator reacted with a "oh the the, incredible", when it did not signal the penalti to Neymar. "It was worth it to include the videoarbitraje", said shortly after. And it can that have reason.