Lately to Bartomeu no happens him neither one. But sometimes also they look for the three feet to the cat when the president of the Barça makes statements. These always have to contextualise and analyse a bit more in depth. In the 'New York Times' left the headline that "Xavi, Iniesta and Messi were the problem for the youngsters of the quarry".
Some words that obviously have caused stir in the social networks, but have to understand like that these players, by his exceptional level, have prevented that other good players of The Farm emerged in all these years. There is a point of reason in this answer, although perhaps the words used were not the most precise to reason it.
The question and the answer were like this: "Recently Xavi criticised to the Barcelona because there was not sufficient young players arriving to the first team as it happened with him, Andrés Iniesta and all the other Agrees?
"No. The problem are Xavi, Iniesta, Leo Messi and all the other. It is very difficult to be player and, when have in front to Leo Messi, Neymar, Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets or Hammered, is very complicated to play here. Xavi was in the first team during 15 years. In this period 15 boys that played in his position had to leave the club. I think that Iniesta has played during 16 or 17 years. It is very difficult. And Leo Messi? Who will be the new Messi? Well, it is likely that there is other Messi, but have to leave the club because it is impossible that play here. Xavi said that we were slower, but the problem is Xavi! He created the problem together with Iniesta and Hammered: they created the problem.
Aleñá And Samper deserve the opportunity
As a result of these words can try think in which players at present can have a gap in the first team. And after the pre-season think that Samper and Aleñá can form part of the group. The first has showed reliable like relief of Busquets, whereas the second has left details of his quality and impudence.