Controversy in England by the economic helps to the 'big' teams of the Premier

The Bank of England has attended to the rescue of the richest clubs of the Premier League, because of the estragos that is generating in the arks of the teams of all Europe the sanitary emergency by the pandemia of the COVID-19. However, in a measure that a priori is positive in the middle of the storm, turned into the centre of the controversy that keeps confronted to the big English groups with the more boys, which allege are discriminated in the difficult current context that confronts the humanity.

And it is that, while the Arsenal and the Tottenham receive more than 300 million euros in helps of the official program of finance of companies in difficulties, with interests of 0,5%, groups like the Southampton, among others lower clubs, the Government has remitted them to other programs that do not offer credits to so low interest like the quoted.

For example, it exists the case of the Southampton, that subscribed a credit of 80 million pounds, but with 9,14% of interest. A situation that contrasts with the 'gunners', those who received 135 millions with an interest of 0,5%, same case of the directed by the Portuguese José Mourinho, that were benefited with 197 millions by the same quota.

Of agreement to the proportionate information by the journalist Diego Torres, the Association of Followers of the Arsenal sustains that the aim of the credit is to ensure the flow of box of the club in case that the stadium of Emirates remain closed to the end of this season, circumstance that would involve some losses of 178 million euros.

In theory, this last would have to fulfil; that is to say, that the money was used to keep the stability while the storm of the COVID-19 follows on the world. "The purpose of the The Covid Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) is to help to the big companies to keep his places of work and his providers. We expect that all those businesses that have received loans use them of a coherent form with this aim", prays part of the communiqué issued by the Ministry of Economy.

What generates suspicacia

But the fault of clarity in the disposals is what has raised ronchas in the small clubs and 'throw toads'. It knows that the British Government imposed to the companies beneficiarias of the official credit some restrictions in the cost, especially rigorous with regard to the payment of premiums to his directors, but does not exist a specific control on the signings. It is this last point, the one who does brotar the suspicacias.