SOCIAL MEDIA BURN FOR THE PENALTY
Indignation for the penalty not hit Atlético in the Madrid derby
Published:1/02/2020 - 20:10h
Updated:1/02/2020 - 20:10h
Atlético de Madrid claimed a penalty from Casemiro to Morata in the first half that seemed obvious to everyone, except for the referee and the VAR. The play was not reviewed and the decision has raised a lot of controversy
The penalti of Casemiro to Morata in the first part of the Real Madrid-Athletic of Madrid is bringing tail and has caused indignation in the surroundings rojiblanco and the one of the FC Barcelona. The Brazilian demolished to the Madrilenian forward inside the area, but neither the referee neither the VAR appreciated that the contact was sufficient as to signal maximum penalty. The referee did not review the played in the screen on foot of field and anybody understands that it took this decision in front of an action of east calibrate.
The Cholo Simeone complained bitterly during the crash, but has not been until afterwards when they have arrived the complaints for real. Felipe, central colchonero, went the first in demanding the action on foot of field in front of the microphones of Movistar. The ex of the Port wine saw it very clear. "The party has a penalti. It was very far of the played and saw that it was penalti. But good...", it ensured the defender.
Enrique Cerezo, president of the Athletic, also demanded the penalti when they asked after him the action on Morata and complained by the performance of the VAR. "If the VAR is for something is to review this type of played. For me it was a penalti clear. It is very difficult pitar a penalti in these parties. There has not been neither justice neither clarity. It is difficult because the referee can see it or not to see it", began ensuring the leader colchonero. In the case of today there has been a played that needed a review of the VAR and does not have dignado neither to go", affirmed.
But no only the members of the first athletic team have outraged , but even his ex players have done it in networks. Paulo Futre, legend of the Atleti, spoke of "theft" in his account of Twitter comparing the action with the popular series 'The House of Paper'. "The theft of the penalti of Casemiro to Morata has been so big that go it to use for the new season of the House of Papel. Flipo That the VAR do not say at all", wrote the luso.
The theft of the penalti of Casemiro to Morata has been so big that go it to use for the new season of The House of Paper. FLIPO That the VAR do not say at all. #RealMadridAtleti pic.twitter.com/qyxnw2q9wy— Paulo Futre (@PauloFutre) February 1, 2020
Cristóbal Soria, recognised antimadridista and current collaborator of the program of television 'The Chringuito', also spoke in Twitter of referee's scandal in LaLiga. "For real until a club do not withdraw to his players of a party in the Bernabéu after the continuous referee's favours to the Real of Madrid will not have a clean and honest League", signalled. The ex delegate of the Seville continued with the claim with another tuit on the controversy played. "Another sad day and marked for the planet football...And always it goes out in the photo the same...The Real of Madrid...", it commented.
For real until a Club do not withdraw to his players of a party in the Bernabéu after the continuous referee's favours to the real of madrid will not have a @LaLiga clean and honest— Cristóbal Soria (@cristobalsoria) February 1, 2020
The Athletic forgave to the Madrid
In spite of this so controversial action, the true is that if the Athletic had been finer of face to door not even had missed this penalti. The colchoneros had three quite clear occasions in the first time, in which the Madrid almost neither existed. Courtois And the little puntería of the ones of Simeone avoided that they advanced in the marker and the merengues finished giving the machada in the second part.