TEBAS SPEAKS AT THE RFEF HEADQUARTERS
Tebas 'charges' again against Barça for the 'Negreira Case': "It is sporting corruption"
The president of LaLiga, Javier Tebas, has offered some statements in which he spoke again about the 'Negreira Case' and the possible sanctions that Barça should receive
Javier Thebes, president of LaLiga, has appeared publicly in front of the headquarters of the Real Spanish Federation of Football and the Technical Committee of Referees to speak, between a lot of things, of the 'Case Negreira'. The mandator went back to give his opinion on the actions of the FC Barcelona and of how this affects to all the Spanish football.
It began his intervention affirming that it has not forgotten of the occurred and that will study the case now that the Barça has been imputed. "I have to see the documentation. The cohecho is when it commits a crime with a public civil servant. Like lawyer, have to study it. It is necessary to follow investigating to clear well the level of influence in the promotions and descents and in the designations", aimed.
Thebes goes back to 'load' against the Barça by Negreira
On the same line, it left on the table that the Barcelona group made acts of sportive corruption in spite of that still there is not any sentence. "This is in what it is working . The alone fact to try influence already is a sancionable in the penal field. It said it the judge in the car of does some weeks. This already is sportive corruption. Pay from a club to Negreira is a very grave irregularity. It is crime if it is to influence", sentenced Thebes.
Also it cleared that from LaLiga can not have any sanction against the Barcelona. "We do not have competitions because they occurred to administrative level. Already I explained it. If we had been able to take part, we had opened a file. Definitely. We have not been able to it do because it is prescribed. We will see which sanction can have when it finish the penal field", ensured the executive.
Finally, it went back to 'load' against the culés desvelando that exist irregularities in the case. "Here there are some indications of some payments that did not have to have made and with this tried influence in the referee's decisions. And the decision of the judge would go from a prevention until a descent of category. Near it is the subject to clear ", concluded.
