The RFEF responds to Laporta's 'threat' and will not give up the images of the Classic

The FC Barcelona has remained outraged with the performance of the VAR in Santiago Bernabéu, during the Classical in front of the Real Madrid, and has asked explanations to the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) by the decision of not validating the goal of Lamine Yamal in the first-half after determining that it had not surpassed entirely the line. To the not having technology, carried out a 'eternal' review in Brush Them that it did not leave satisfied to the Catalans. Joan Laporta complained openly.

The maximum Barcelona mandator announced that "like club, want to have the security of what happened and inform that from the Barcelona will require to the Technical Committee of Referees and to the Spanish Federation of Football that facilitate us all the images and audios that generated the action" and that "will require immediately to the Technical Committee of Referees and to the Spanish Federation of Football so that it facilitate us the whole of images and audios that generated the played".

Unrest in the RFEF with the Barça

In the Real Spanish Federation of Football, according to Sportive World, have not remained very happy with the 'threat' of the Barcelona president and that will not do an exception only because the Barça has asked it: "there are not audios to the letter", explain, adding that "there are open doors" for a "constructive meeting" of Laporta with the CTA.

The true is that the RFEF has not facilitated to any team the videos recorded of the parties or those that uses the VAR to review the actions during the parties. Several clubs have requested it during this season, but has been denied the application. With the Catalans, in spite of the annoyance that exists by the Classical, will not be the exception. What if it has trascended are the audios of the conversation between César Soto Degree, main referee, and Sánchez Martínez from Brush Them.

The controversy will extend in LaLiga

In the conversation, the referees concluded in that there was not evidence to determine if it had gone in the balloon to the goal of Andriy Lunin. It is worth it to remember that Laporta announced that "if once analysed the documentation understand that it produced an error in the assessment of the played, that is what think, will start all the timely actions for revertir the situation without descartar the legal actions that do lacking. In case to confirm that it was a legal goal, will go further and will ask the repetition of the party as it happened in a meeting of European field by error of the VAR".