To Lenglet himself him pitaron penal, but no to Casemiro…
Published:22/02/2021 - 09:13h
Updated:22/02/2021 - 09:13h
Martínez Munuera did not doubt in sentencing the maximum penalty after the imprudencia of Clément Lenglet, but Casemiro did not run with the same luck in Valladolid
Controversial penal. Once again the norm perspective goes back to generate stir, as the infringement inside the area is some times considered like penalti and others, no. The invention of the term is him attributed to José Luis Mendilibar, technician of an Eibar that in September of 2017 felt prejudiced in a been bulky result (6-1) in the Camp Nou after considering that the penal that opened the goleada was of those that can or no pitarse. This weekend has seen at least a pair of penal in two parties of LaLiga in which it begins decide the title.
A day after Guillermo Squares Fernández, born referee in Madrid ascribed to the Balearic Committee, no pitara a penalti by a clear pisotón of Casemiro to Kike Pérez in the party Valladolid - Real Madrid (0-1), the Alicante Juan Martínez Munuera, of the Valencian Committee, if it took the decision to sentence the maximum penalty in the Camp Nou to Lenglet, by a fault committed to Rubén Nephew by a contact with a similar intensity.
Truly it touched the boot of the forward of the Cádiz the imprudent defence of the Barcelona? It seems that sucedió like this, a brush more than a hit sucedido in his irrational attempt of clear, like the mediocampista of the white group to the boot of Kike Pérez with 0-0 in the marker of Zorrilla in his risky stride. But only one of the two actions was considered like penaltyl.
The fault of the madridista was similar to the penalti of Frenkie Of Jong to Djené in Getafe that cost him to the Barça the defeat by the minimum (1-0) in the first turn. As there was a slight contact, the decision was not argued, as for this was the VAR. But in Valladolid neither VAR (was the Aragonese Santiago Jaime Latre) neither the conventional arbitration. There they became attached to the old habits of "is not sufficient for penalti", argued viejuno that, meanwhile, was not applied for Of Jong in the the Coliseum Alfonso Pérez Muñoz, with arbitration that day of the riojano César Soto Degree, neither for Lenglet in front of the Cádiz.
Lenglet Does not have luck with Munuera
Martínez Munuera already had him pitado the controversial penalti in the Classical of the first turn in the Camp Nou by agarrón to Sergio Bouquets. In said played was induced to the error by part of the murciano José María Sánchez Martínez, the attendant of the VAR, the one who insisted in the review of an action that the Valencian Committee already had interpreted well from the start: struggle without more between Sergio Bouquets and Clément Lenglet inside the Barcelona area, as sucede in tens of played of strategy of each party, own of the game in himself. And when reviewing fotograma by fotograma, pitó penal by inertia, rewarding the phenomenal theatrical performance of the captain merengue, that fell of backs when Lenglet him halaba the T-shirt by in front. It was the 1-2 in a commitment that finalised 1-3, perhaps transcendental.