ANALYSIS: Much more VAR in favour that against of the Real Madrid from the complaints

The madridismo can not complain of the last referee's decisions, and especially of which have had review of the VAR of by half. Since the merengues complained openly of the videoarbitraje, as a result of the defeat suffered against the Real Sociedad in which no pitó a clear penalti of Rulli on Vinicius, fits to stand out that the arbitration has favoured more than prejudiced to the ones of Solari.

Throwing an ojeada to the last parties contested by the Real Madrid in all the competitions, remains clear that the white team has had in the videoarbitraje a good backrest that almost always has acted to his favour, although in some occasion with unfair decisions for the contrary teams, as the one of the penalti non-existent to Casemiro of the past Sunday in front of the Raise.

Like this it has acted the VAR with the Real Madrid in the last parties:

Betis-Real Madrid

In the crash of League contested does some days in Benito Villamarín, the VAR acted to validate a goal of Sergio Channels, the one who marked the momentary tie until Ceballos annotated the definite goal of fault that gave the victory to the merengues. The images showed that Channels was on line with the defence, of the same form that used to give by valid, previously, the initial goal of Benzema. Decisions hit.

Real Madrid-Girona

In the gone of the eliminatory copera, the VAR reviewed a goal of Lucas Vázquez by the position in which it found Odriozola when receiving the balloon before giving the definite pass, and the images showed that the position was correct. Also it reviewed the goal of Benzema and gave by valid after the assistance of Vinicius. Decisions also hit of the VAR.

Espanyol-Real Madrid

The VAR reviewed a goal of Gareth Bleat by a possible fault on Baptistao to the start of the played, that meant the 1-4. It did not appreciate the fault and gave validity to the goal, whereas shortly after also gave validity to the goal of Rosebushes, that went the 2-4, since it had been cancelled previously by an offside non-existent. Good decisions that did not affect to the final result.

Athletic-Real Madrid

East was the party in which more played reviewed . The first was the goal of Griezmann, that was conceded legally although previously Vinicius received a fault in the centre of the field. The most controversial decision, however, went the one to concede the penalti of Giménez on the Brazilian, non-existent since the contact produced out of the area. Also there was controversial with Morata, to the one who cancelled him a goal by offside non-existent . Afterwards, it did not signal a possible penalti in favour of the forward when considering the referee that there had been hand of the player.

Ajax-Real Madrid

In the gone of eighth of final of Champions League, to the Ajax cancelled him a goal of Tagliafico when understanding the referee, supported by the VAR, that a player of the Ajax, Tadic, had done screen between the goalkeeper and the balloon and, when having participated in the played, had to signal his position of offside. It was the possible 1-0 for the Ajax, that did not give . At the end, the Real Madrid won by 1-2.

Raise-Real Madrid

The VAR acted in two occasions. The first to signal a penalti in favour of the Real Madrid by hands of Bardhi, a correct decision put that the images showed how the player had the separate hand of the body. The second played was the most commented. Churches Villanueva signalled a penalti non-existent of Doukouré on Casemiro, since the brush between the boot of the levantino and the average of the Brazilian was not sufficient to signal the maximum penalty. Casemiro Filmed by the floor, confirmed the penalti and Bleat marked it. Unfair decision for the Raise.