The referees speak of the controversy in the 'derby' Madrilenian

The Real Madrid surpassed to the Athletic by 1-3 in the 'derby' Madrilenian of LaLiga Santander. The whites played better that the rojiblancos and deserved the victory, but also could receive some referee's help in a very controversial meeting in which the VAR was decisive. In a news that collects MD, several ex referees pronounce and give his opinion on the played more controversial of the meeting.

The penalti to Vinicius

For the ex collegiate César Barrenechea Montero the infringement was out of the area, with what was not penalti. As it commented Andújar Oliver to Radius Marks, for him also produced out of the area. Instead, for Arturo Daudén Ibáñez, in words to Wave Zero, the contact began was, but could finish inside. As it commented the ex referee, "the images are not the sufficiently clear" as so that the VAR went in to value the action.

Finally, Iturralde González explained for the Chain Be that for him the played is doubtful, but thinks that the demolish produces with the knee inside the area. It commented that the fault begins was, but that according to his opinion finish inside, with what there was pitado maximum penalty.

The fault to Vinicius in the goal of Griezmann

Barrenechea Montero explained to MD that there was lacking in the goal of the Athletic to the Brazilian, with what the so much rojiblanco would not have to have gone up to the marker. Iturralde Explained that it is fault, although it cleared that the VAR can not go in because it is not a clear "and self-evident error". Daudén Also there was pitado infringement of Belt in the start of the played, but cleared that it is not a played very clear, with what understands that the VAR neither took part.

Penalti To Morata of Casemiro

Daudén Ibáñez explained that for him is not penalti, since the forward of the Athletic exaggerates it, although there is something of contact. Iturralde, instead, thinks that he yes there was pitado maximum penalty in this played, although it understands that the VAR did not go in because "it is not a clear and self-evident fault". Andújar Oliver also there was pitado penalti because according to his words Casemiro demolishes to Morata.

The possible expulsion of Bleat

Daudén Ibáñez was the only in speaking of this played and explained that for him Bleat would have to have gone to the changing rooms after the gesture that devoted him to the athletic fans. Besides, it explained that it does not understand like the VAR did not take part, since the played is very clear and sees perfectly.

The goal cancelled to Morata by out of juegio

Barrenechea Montero gave his opinion on the so much that cancelled him to Morata in the second half by offside. The ex referee thinks that is one of the played more complicated, although it does not understand why the VAR did not throw the lines in the repetitions. In Twitter has circulated an image in which it appreciates that it is not offside, but in the image of the party seemed that the forward was something advanced. For the ex referee "if they have valued it and is to a level of millimetres,  does not have felt that anybody do reinterpretación".