Mateu Lahoz says the referee could whistle penalties from Koundé and Cancelo against Porto

The excolegiado Mateu Lahoz valued some ofl ace controversial actions of the Port wine-FC Barcelona in 'Movistar +' and for little surprise of a lot of culés, considered that the English Anthony Taylor could have distinguished penalti in at least two opportunities in favour of the Portuguese team. The exárbitro went in to analyse the played of the second day of the Champions League, between them, the action of Koundé and the one of Joao Cancel.

The first was a very controversial action in which there is a struggle in the area between Koundé and the forward of the Port wine, Taremi. In the image can see how the moment that treats to turn the forward, Koundé, first, holds him the T-shirt and afterwards plants the leg between the thighs of the forward. It shows that there is contact, but the difficulty is to interpret if sufficient as to do fall to the forward of the Port wine.

The Barça had to be 'punished' with two penaltis?

Lahoz Valued the action when commenting that "Koundé risks. If Taylor arrives to pitar penalti, at all that say. It is a grey action", ensured. Equally the Spanish did not show doubts that both played could have meant penalti, since in his opinion, the referee does not make a mistake if the pita, or if no it pita, since it can consider that it is not sufficient for maximum penalty, this last with regard to the played of the central French.

In this action had not called by part of the VAR and the Barça could continue with the remaining minutes of the first time. Already near of the end of the party would arrive the another action that Lahoz analysed, in which Taylor interpreted that there is hand of Eustaquio, a hand that Mateu does not see of the all clear. "I remain me with the doubt on the hand of Cancel. I do not know if it is previous hand of Eustaquio. In the takings that see... It is legal part. It would be hand of Cancel and penalti/lacking", added.