10 questions that all asked on the 'Case Messi'

After knowing that Messi will go to trial and when seeing the tumbos that has given his case, to the Barcelona fans the situation seems him a so much suspect and has launched a series of doubts that will treat to answer. From if it can finish in the prison until if it can avoid still the same trial

Ticket - Gone in FC Barcelona vs Ray - League J8
Ticket - Gone in Ray vs FC Barcelona - League J27
Ticket - Gone in for all the parties of the FC Barcelona

Finally Inland revenue accused officially to Leo Messi of course fiscal fraud and has forced him to seat in the bench of the accused. After a first moment in which it thought that it would not be like this after withdrawing him the indictments by part of the Fiscalía, the Pubic Inland revenue did not consider it like this and will arrive with his case until the last. It is thus that in front of so many papers and so many indictments of a part and of another arise questions of ineludible answer for the Barcelona fan. These are the 10 more important that arouses the 'Case Messi' and to which gives answer the lawyer of the State, Marcos But, for the newspaper 'Mark':

1-it Can finish Leo Messi in the prison?

No. In spite of being able to become convict pro firm sentence, the penalty requested is lower to the two years and, to the not having penal antecedents and have paid the money sued, his case will remain in a strong fine to his pocket, in case to go out guilty.

2- Why Inland revenue follows with the process when the Fiscalía has it exculpado?

Because Inland revenue and Fiscalía are two entes distinct. While the Fiscalía, public indictment, looks after the interest of the legality and no by any interest credit what has done that it gave by understood that the player was not manager of what did, the Legal profession of the State if it exerts his private prosecution in defenso of a credit in favour of the Public Inland revenue, that, in this case, would be the victim of the presumptive fiscal crime.

3-it Could have change of criterion by part of the Fiscalia in the day of the trial?

No, this would be impossible. It is almost sure that the Fiscal Ministry reiterate the exculpación of Leo Messi or limits to the exposed previously. Under any conecpto can change already his criterion.

4-it has been able to avoid that Messi went to trial?

Yes, but like the defence of the player has not recognised the facts in any moment, thing that would have reduced the penalty a third. Defending his honorabilidad, has not been able to arrive to a coformidad of the facts and, therefore, a condemnatory sentence with both edicts of agreement.

5-it Could avoid go to trial Messi?

Could arrive to an agreement or compliance until the day that signal the oral trial. To be able to do it, in addition to the already paid by the crack Argentinian, would have to credit the amounts that asks him to the player and to his father by part of the Inland revenue, in addition to the coasts debenidas by the performance of the lawyer of the State.

6-When it will make the trial?

Still it does not know the exact date of this. For now it finds in the point in which the indictment has to present his alegatos  form them against the imputed. The oral trial already has been opened and the accused will have ten days to present his writings of defence. All this will be envoy to the penal Judge, the one who will dictate the day of the trial.

7-it would lose Messi some key party of the FC Barcelona?

In case to coincide the sight with an important meeting by part of the Argentinian this could suspend if any of the two parts opone. The judge would have to avoid the coincidence previously, connoisseur of the diary of the footballer.

8-What looks for Inland revenue?

Pursue the supposedly criminal performance, applying the juridical consequence that proceed, and this in profit of all the taxpayers. That is to say, restituir to the erario public the purportedly defrauded.

9-could arrive to a pact between Messi and Inland revenue?

Yes, remaining always paid the previously mentioned quantities.

10And the best solution for the case?

The best would be to arrive to an agreement by both parts that avoid the trial and reward to the erario public the supposed quantities defrauded more the corresponding fine.