THE VAR, PROTAGONIST IN THE MATCH
The referees agree in the analysis of the controversies of the 'robbery' to the Barça
Published:5/10/2022 - 13:45h
Updated:5/10/2022 - 13:45h
Slavko Vincic's arbitration has been at the center of the controversy due to some of his rulings at Inter-Barça. Several experts in the field have made their assessments clear, although with different nuances.
The FC Barcelona has gone back to fall in the Champions, no without something of controversy in some played that finished being determinants in the result of the meeting. These have generated repercussion, distinct opinions and readings, such as those that have done some experts in the matter with his comments on the played of assessment and application of the regulation.
Some of the most questioned actions have been the so much cancelled to Pedri González and the hand of Denzel Dumfries, played that they could change totally the future of the commitment. To few hours to culminate the meeting, 'Sportive World' has collected the analysis of several experts in the arbitration, those who signal some desaciertos by part of the main of the Inter-Barça, Slavko Vincic.
The experts analyse the Inter-Barça
For César Luis Barrenechea Montero, the referee esloveno did not have a bad performance and considers like acceptable the nine yellow cards showed, although possibly it have had to sanction a more in the entrance of Matteo Darmian to Pedri. Another negative appearance has been the VAR, that did not signal the hand of Dumfries, in addition to applying distinct criteria when Ansu Fati starred a played similar.
By his part, Eduardo Iturralde González, indicates that it has had to exist a same criterion in both incidences of the commitment: "If the hand of Ansu considers it voluntary, the one of Dumfries also is it. It is inexplicable what occurred with the hand of Dumfries. Slavko Vincic Did not keep the same criterion in the two played more controversies of the party and that both affected to the interests of the FC Barcelona".
In the same tonic, has pronounced Juan Andújar Oliver: "In my opinion, the referee did not keep the same criterion in the two played controversies of the Inter-Barça. The goal of Pedri comes preceded of a hand of Ansu Fati above the shoulder, voluntary, and therefore, is correct his cancellation. Instead, the referee esloveno had to signal penalti in favour of the FC Barcelona in the time discount by a clear hand of the Dutch defender Dumfries".
Errors in the realisation that entorpecieron to the VAR
For Pedro Martín there are not valid reasons that justify the cancellation of the so much signed by the Canarian midfield player, although it subtracts him culpability to the videoarbitraje: "The hand is hand and is penalti like a piano, but in this case exculpo to the VAR because in the moment the realisation of the party was not able to give him a clear image to the referee of the VAR so that this warned to the main referee so that it was to review the action".
Vincic Would not have been to the height
Finally, Pavel Fernández himself attribute all the responsibility to the referee esloveno: "Vincic did lean favour to the arbitration. It is inexplicable that no pite this hand of Dumfries when all have seen it by the TV from house all Europe. It is a punishable hand, above the head, widespread arm. It is a small referee, already said that this gentleman is not a referee for pitar this type of parties".