It FOLLOWS THE CONTROVERSY IN LEAGUE
For the Committee yes there was penalti in the Villarreal-Madrid
Published:28/02/2017 - 00:29h
Updated:28/02/2017 - 01:13h
When seeming the Technical Committee of Referees considers that the balloon arrived rebounded to the hand of Bruno Soriano to a speed the sufficiently slow so that the player of the Villarreal could withdraw it. They defend the penalti pitado by Manzano
In spite of the big injustice of the penalti pitado against the Villarreal during the party of this Sunday against the Real Madrid, that to the dessert finish incidiendo directly in the white triumph, apparently from the Technical Committee of Referees would follow defending the decision taken by Gil Manzano, giving by valid the maximum penalty pitada by the referee.
As it has informed the "Chain BE", when seeming from the Committee, having examined the played thoroughly, would think that Bruno Soriano had sufficient time as to withdraw the hand and not touching the spherical after the back rebound to the shot of Toni Kroos.
"It will not consider deliberate hand when a player plays the balloon of accidental form if the balloon proceeds of a rebound of the leg or the body of the same player that contests it", says the circulate of 6 August 2015, but would think that corresponded to Gil Manzano decide if the hand was accidental or no, when finding Bruno Soriano in a no natural "position".
There would have been penalti in Champions League
In any case, fits to stand out that in the norms of the FIFA and the UEFA only speaks to punish the hands inside the area when they are "deliberate", by what said action would not have remained punished with penalti in European or international competitions.
What is clear is that the decision of Gil Manzano finish prejudicing notably to the Villarreal, that lost the party in in front of the Real Madrid (2-3), and of consistent way to a FC Barcelona that it will have to follow rowing in League Santander.
