IN THE TRIUMPH AGAINST LIGHTNING
Casemiro, pointed out again: They forgave him the red and he was the worst in Madrid
Published:27/02/2022 - 08:40h
Updated:27/02/2022 - 08:40h
In the opinion of several fans and even by the Rayo Vallecano players, Casemiro must have seen the red card in the league match that the whites won by the minimum. The play was even reviewed by the VAR, but there was no expulsion
In spite of the important victory in LaLiga in front of the Ray Vallecano that moves away to the Madrid in the leadership of the tournament of the regularity, the whites have not been exentos of criticisms in a party suffered that culminated with a victory by the minimum difference. In the centre of the controversy finds Carlos Henrique Casemiro, whose action in the commitment could cost him an expulsion.
In a played that it had to be reviewed by the VAR, observes how the midfield player goes directly to Óscar Valentín with the swearwords to the front, a played that usually it is punished with a red card. Valentín had to be remplazado after the action of the Brazilian that in the rest of the party would have a poor performance in spite of that the whites took out the three points of Vallecas.
Indignation in the Ray
One of the present players in Vallecas,Mario Suárez, has recognised the superiority of the rival in spite of the defeat: "we Know that against the Real Madrid or were upper in intensity, winning duels and hitting up in the occasions, or did not have a lot of options. Have one of the best goalkeepers of the world, have not been hit and they in a big played have marked".
Nevertheless, it has left clear that Casemiro deserved to go to the changing room after the action on his mate, a played that even it was mentioned to the referee: "This fault is red because I have seen it in video and photo. Oscar has blood in the sock. We comment it to him to the referee and says that it is not red because it does not bend him the ankle, but in images sees that yes. If it bends it to him more splits it to him".
Likewise, it has questioned the use of the videoarbitraje in this type of situations, especially when it treats to notify to the main referee: "I Understand that it was his assessment in direct because there are people and is a fast-acting, but do not understand why the VAR does not warn him. The VAR went to go in in these situations, has not gone in and has prejudiced us".
