It seems that the double rasero is something that always goes intrinsic to the Committee of Competition. Especially after comparing another case of the past campaign together with the recent of the FC Barcelona, where in place to encircle to the communiqué of the referee seems that they can add a posteriori things... Unlike with the Portuguese.
That day the forward of the Real Madrid finish expelled in Córdoba. Cristiano gave him a patada brutal to Edimar what cost him the double caution, after carrying the first cardboard after assaulting to the defender Crespo. After all this show, the attacker finish his individual show abandoning The New Arcángel cleaning the shield of champions of the world in an attitude prepotente and provocadora for with the local fans.
This day, the referee did not aim in his record the aggression to Crespo neither neither the provocation of CR7 to the bloated verdiblanca. Neither it described like aggression the patada to Edimar and Competition did not add, in this case, absolutely at all. To the forward fell him two parties of sanction in spite of all what had occurred on the terrain of game after Blond, Osorio and Mayor, the three members of Competition, ciñeron only to the record.
Something that has changed totally with it sucedido in Mestalla, where rained objects against the Barcelona players. In the record, Undiano Mallenco does not speak in any moment of a bad behaviour of the players of the Barça. Instead, and unlike what sucedió with the international Portuguese, Competition adds things to the exposed by the referee navarro. "The little exemplary behaviour of some players (of the Barça) disqualifies them and ridicules by himself only", can read in the writing of Competition. Then, for some himself and for others no? Where it is the vara to measure?