The ex referees of LaLiga coincide: "there was not any penalti to Casemiro"

The three points harvested by the Real Madrid this Sunday against the Raise, in the Ciutat of València, smell to chamusquina. The ones of Solari benefited of two penaltis to finish winning by 1-2. The first was more or less clear by hands of Bardhi in the interior of the area, but the second did not exist, and besides would have to have derived in a yellow cardboard to Casemiro by his flagrant 'piscinazo'.

The Brazilian left fall in the interior of the area and pretended a patada after a slight brush of Doukouré. The collegiate Churches Villanueva no thought it to him and signalled the penalti, whereas from the VAR heard the traditional 'cri-cri' of the nocturnal crickets. Anybody went out to revoke the decision of the referee, although the repetitions left clear that there was not contact between Doukouré and Casemiro and that, if there was it, was not sufficient to signal penalti.

In fact, it calls the attention that the two referee's analysts of the two media of press written more affine to the actuality of the Real Madrid, 'ACE' and 'Mark', have coincided when denying that it existed penalti on Casemiro. The ex collegiate Iturralde González and Andújar Oliver have it very clear, like the rest of the world that have seen the repetitions, and of course do not leave intoxicate by the madridismo more acérrimo.

"It does not appreciate any contact of Doukouré on Casemiro. A maximum penalty that according to the images of the television did not have to signal", explained Andújar Oliver in the program 'Marker' of Radius MARKS, in some statements that have been backed by Iturralde González, the one who neither saw any penalti of Doukouré on Casemiro.

"For me it is not penalti. Casemiro Throws . Doukouré Gives a patada to the air and seems that it does not give him in the leg. The VAR does not say him to the referee that go to see it because it is not clear and self-evident. It is necessary to leave clear a thing. If it does not arrive to pitar the penalti the VAR neither had gone in".

Why the VAR did not resolve the error of Churches Villanueva?

Iturralde, besides, wanted to offer his explanations on why the VAR did not go in to the hour to invalidate the decision of Churches Villanueva. "The judge of line has seen it clear to signal penalti. The VAR has seen a repetition where can have a small contact and therefore, as it is not clear and manifest the error, has not said him at all to the referee".

In definite, the result was that the Real Madrid benefited of a referee's error of Churches Villanueva to carry the three points of the Ciutat of València, in front of a Raise that, in spite of the protests even of his president, Quico Catalan, saw how snatched him unfairly like minimum a point this Sunday in the classification of LaLiga Santander 2018-19.