SCHUSTER CRITICISES THE DECISION
"In the goal cancelled to the Ajax there is not offside neither fault neither at all"
Published:14/02/2019 - 00:27h
Updated:14/02/2019 - 00:27h
The ex player and ex trainer of the Real Madrid, Bernd Schuster, criticised the decision of the VAR to cancel the goal of Tagliafico in front of the group merengue in Champions. Others 'expert' as Andújar Oliver and Futre also pronounced
Diverse 'expert', ex trainers and ex technicians pronounced on the decision of the referee Skomina, helped of the VAR, to the hour to cancel the goal of Tagliafico in the first-half of the Ajax-Real Madrid of this Wednesday, contested in Johan Cruyff Sand and corresponding to the gone of eighth of final of the UEFA Champions League 2018-19.
The referee decided to cancel the goal when interfering Tadic, that was slightly offside -by centimetres-, in the action. The forward of the Ajax interposed between Courtois and the striker, in this case Tagliafico, and the rule of the UEFA determine therefore that participated in the played -in spite of not touching the balloon- and that the goal was very cancelled.
It does not think the same Bernd Schuster, ex player and ex trainer of the Real Madrid, the one who pronounced on the played in 'Radioestadio' of Wave Zero and, as always, was very cutting with his words. "The goal cancelled by the VAR to Tagliafico is a goal like a cathedral. There is not neither offside, neither fault to Courtois, neither at all", signalled the German.
On the same line it pronounced the ex referee that analyses the played controversial in 'Irradiate Mark', Andújar Oliver, the one who gave by valid the goal. "What more see the image more seems me a legal goal. The videoarbitraje signals that there is offside of Tadic when it finishes Tagliafico but the player can not remove, does not hinder to Courtois, does not have influence and the so much had to go up to the marker".
Futre Alludes to a possible 'black hand' of the Real Madrid
And it fits to signal also another type of criticisms, with Paulo Futre like example. The legend of the Athletic of Madrid remembered the 'help' received by the whites the past weekend, against the group 'colchonero' in Wanda Metropolitan. "Second goal that steals the VAR to a team rojiblanco in less than a week. In front of the lower doubt is clear to which side falls...", it wrote through the social networks.
In definite, is clear that the played has not remained at all clear in spite of the explanations of the UEFA through Twitter. The goal cancelled to Nicolás Tagliafico will bring tail, and the controversy is served of face to the next days...
