WITH ÁLVARO TEJERO And LUCAS VÁZQUEZ
'Case Chumi': The Real Madrid interpreted the rule like the Barça until in two occasions
Published:18/01/2019 - 01:41h
Updated:18/01/2019 - 01:41h
The FC Barcelona defends that there was not undue alignment of Chumi in the Glass of Rey, and in addition to presenting solid arguments has the support of some precedents. The Real Madrid interpreted the rule of the same form until in two distinct occasions
After obtaining the pass to quarter-finals with a traced back against the Raise in the Camp Nou, the FC Barcelona is slope to confirm his continuity in the Glass of the King in the dispatches, after the complaint that will present the Valencians to the RFEF by the presumptive undue alignment of Chumi in the clash of gone in the Ciutat of València. The differences of interpretation of the rule have caused an agitated debate, but the culés consider that has reason and explain, besides, with some examples.
The article of the discord is the 56.3 of the Disciplinary Code, matizado in the circulate number 28 published on 29 November 2018. "The way of fulfillment of the sanctions imposed like consequence of the commission of infringements for the cases in which it exist a simultaneity of licences of the allowed in the General Regulation of the RFEF, will adjust to the had in the present article, although, the sanctions of slight character will fulfil in the competitions in which the offender finds doing use of a determinate licence", signals this last document.
Like this, the Barcelona defend that the defender was enabled to play in spite of fulfilling cycle of yellow with the filial, since this would fit with the previously exposed requirements and would justify his presence with the first team. This version have underlined it several members of the entity barcelonista, and indirectly also did it the rival maximum until in two occasions.
The Real Madrid lived until two cases like the one of Chumi
The Real Madrid lived until in two occasions an exact situation to which the Barça faced with Chumi, and in both took the same decision without that there were consequences. As it has cleared the RFEF, if there is not complaint of by half, the Committee of Competition can not go in of job, but in any case, this seats a precedent that could favour the argument of the culés.
In first of these examples sucedió in the campaign 2016-17, with the youngster 'merengue' Álvaro Tejero. After seeing the fifth yellow with the Castilla, Zinedine Zidane plant to the defender like titling against the Cultural Leonese, and few days afterwards fulfilled the pertinent punishment ausentándose of the following commitment of the B.
But besides, the played repeated with Lucas Vázquez, in a sequence of meetings that took place does hardly a week. The Galician was expelled by double caution in front of the Real Sociedad in LaLiga, and contested, precisely, the commitment of gone of eighth of final of Glass in front of the Leganés. The back weekend was not in front of the Real Betis, something that has turned into an usual and at all suspicious practice, since in the three cases treats of a sanction of slight character.