CONTROVERSY IN VALENCIA-BARÇA
The press of Valencia clama against the arbitration of Undiano
Published:23/10/2016 - 10:38h
Updated:23/10/2016 - 19:27h
The means of Valencia were very critical with the arbitration of Undiano in the party against the FC Barcelona, ensuring tajantemente that the referee navarro prejudiced to the "chés" and benefited to the Barça giving him, even, the triumph
Although the FC Barcelona also had sufficient reasons as to criticise the arbitration of Undiano Mallenco in front of the "chés", full of permissiveness in Mestalla, the true is that the means of Valencia and the Spanish capital attribute almost totally to the referee navarro the local defeat, ensuring that the referee favoured to the Barcelona and prejudiced to Valencia with his decisions.
The most incendiary and conclusive has been "Superdeporte", that dared to speak of "rob" in his virtual cover, just after it finished the party between both teams. "The referee gives an illegal goal of Messi, does not expel to Busquets and signals a penalti decisive in the last second", resume in the half, that frivoliza besides on the injury of Andrés Iniesta.
"The Argentinian [Enzo Pérez] went in strong and cleared the balloon, but in the drag the player of the FC Barcelona suffered an injury in the knee that forced him to abandon the terrain of game. The players of the Barça asked card for Enzo, did not have it, but from this moment signalled it everything against Valencia", expresses the half in question.
"Enzo Pérez went in strong and cleared the balloon, but in the drag Iniesta suffered an injury"
Other sectors of the press, as "El País", were more neutral: "The referee was condescendiente with the physical football of the boys of Prandelli, surely because it allows the body to body, assessment that him recriminan the barcelonistas, and instead prejudiced to Valencia in the actions of assessment, especially in the 0-1 of Messi", can read.
On the other hand, "MD" wanted to put the focus in the indescifrable arbitration of Undiano Mallenco, further that it favoured to a team or another. "Undiano Mallenco Is the referee that more split has directed in First Division. Already it carries 295 and it approaches to the 300 since it debuted in the year 2000. 16 years pitando in the maximum category of the Spanish football and the regulation that uses the navarro still is a mystery. The players analyse him in the first minutes of each party to know the criterion, as if it treated of a menu of a restaurant. (...). It was clear: the first dish, the permissiveness".
The case is that the big prejudiced of Valencia-FC Barcelona, further of the criticisms made from Valencian territory, is clear that it is an Undiano Mallenco to the one who the Spanish press has thrown him on of global way.
