ANY OF THE ACTIONS WAS DOUBTFUL
LAUGHING: Real Madrid blames VAR for Valencia's win
Published:9/11/2020 - 01:13h
Updated:9/11/2020 - 14:45h
In the Real Madrid have not taken well the goleada of Valencia and from some sectors complain of the three penaltis in which the VAR took part
The Real Madrid did the ridiculous against the Valency in Mestalla fitting four goals, although the fact that three of them went of penalti outraged to the madridismo although all they went clear. The first was by clear hands of Lucas Vázquez, the second by a hard entrance of Marcelo to Maxi Gómez and the third by other clear hands of Sergio Bouquets.
But it seems that in the Real Madrid are not satisfied with the VAR, that acted in some of these played simply to ratify that all were object of penalti. Besides, from the team madridista demand a supposed fault of Denis Cherishev on Marco Asensio in the start of the played of the goal in own door of Raphael Varane that supposed the second so much of Valencia.
The first in complaining was Thibaut Courtois, demanding the played of the penalti of Marcelo and the one of the supposed fault on Marco Asensio. The funny of all this is that it recognised openly have not seen any of the two played, reason by which the two complaints seem absurd.
"The first penalti is penalti, is bad luck, do not know why has repeated . The second goal is bad luck, in the rest were motivated to give him the turn. At all more begin do a stop that goes to the stick and afterwards two penaltis. Maxi Shouts more and like pita penalti already the VAR... In the second goal there was lacking to Asensio, have listened it in the changing room but in the changing room no longer can change at all", commented.
Emilio Butragueño, director of Relanciones Institutional of the Real Madrid, also complained, in this case by the fault that purportedly did him Denis Cherishev to Marco Asensio in the start of the played. "We felt us comfortable, the first penalti arrives and us empatan. Afterwards it arrives the second goal, that takes part the VAR. We understand that for this is the VAR, but probably think that have to see all the played, from the start, that there is a fault to Asensio", said.
Besides, also it complained because, as it believes, the penalti on Maxi Gómez is fault on Marcelo. "In the second part arrives us the following penalti that, is a personal opinion, but thought that they went to pitar lacking in favour ours. They see it of another way and complicates us the party, more even with the accident of the following penalti. It has been a penalty because we carried the very directed party", sentenced.
Appealing to his moderate speech of always, Zinedine Zidane was of the few madridistas that did not want to do the ridiculous with absurd claims. "The referee is here to look the things. They have put us three penaltis and a goal in own door. It has happened us of everything. It is too today for us", it said in a start, for later add in room of press that "do not put me with the referees because they are they those that arbitrate".
The one who more topped was Tomás Roncero, with a festival of absurd claims that do not have waste. During the party, wrote several tuits that later would complete with a speech against the VAR that gives little more than laugh by the one of sandeces that even asks. "Inexplicable The blunder of Varane in his autogol. But previously there has been lacking of Cheryshev to Marco Asensio no distinguished", wrote after the second goal of Valencia.
Later, it complained of the played of the third penalti: "Fault of Maxi to Marcelo that the referee turns into penalti. Today it does not touch to speak of the VAR. If it becomes the other way around what would have to read and listen...". After the third penalti, put baza again. "This himself is penalti. But they resort to his memory to see when they remember a team to the that him piten three penaltis against in the same party", said, without taking into account that the three were very distinguished.
Finally, it topped his speech of absurd protests in a video for the newspaper 'Ace', in which it demands two penaltis totally non-existent on Karim Benzema, one by a supposition pisotón and another by a supposition manotazo. A speech to the height of a journalist of scarf like which Tomás Roncero never dissembles that it is.