The "theft" clamoroso that suffered Satrústegui and his memory of this week

The big clubs always are tied to big feats and attainments, although also to big scandals. Mainly in referee's matter, what bigger is the greater team will be the requirement and each played doubtful that piten to his favour, always will be reason of debate and designation for the club and the referee commissioned to do it.

But some also that many times these scandals are justified, as in the case of the Real Madrid, that the past Monday went out alive of Valdebebas after confronting to the Real Sociedad with a tie to a goal that could be victory for the donostiarras by a penal no pitado to Casemiro in the initial minutes of the party.

It does not come by this game the acotación of the scandals, because far to determine if there was penal or no, exist tools and preparation so that the referee's triples can do his work of the best way, although the interpretation always will be leading. Rather, it comes to collation the subject by the memory of Jesús María Satrústegui, ex player of the Real Sociedad.

A day after the party, the maximum player of the Real went through the microphones of the program "Què t'hi jugues", of the Chain BE, to value the performance of the referee that according to his opinion, made a mistake the Monday and did him remember it sucedido on 23 March 1980, does almost 41 exact years.

"The of now is not at all compared with the of our times. They removed us a league with a penalti invented, cancelled me a goal, went an armed robbery. The Real Sociedad would have to have a league more", ensured Satrústegui while it sentences that "any mate" of that then thinks of the same form.

Said meeting finished with final marker of 2-2 thanks to a penal pitado by José Luis García Carrión, that was capitalised by Juanito while several white players invaded the area in the collection. That day, could go expelled with merits Juanito, Stielike and Benito, besides goal cancelled to Jesús María.

The doubt does not help

The big clubs always are tied to big feats and attainments, although also to big scandals. Mainly in referee's matter, what bigger is the greater team will be the requirement and each played doubtful that piten to his favour, always will be reason of debate and designation for the club and the referee commissioned to do it.

But some also that many times these scandals are justified, as in the case of the Real Madrid, that the past Monday went out alive of Valdebebas after confronting to the Real Sociedad with a tie to a goal that could be victory for the donostiarras by a penal no pitado to Casemiro in the initial minutes of the party.

It does not come by this game the acotación of the scandals, because far to determine if there was penal or no, exist tools and preparation so that the referee's triples can do his work of the best way, although the interpretation always will be leading. Rather, it comes to collation the subject by the memory of Jesús María Satrústegui, ex player of the Real Sociedad.

A day after the party, the maximum player of the Real went through the microphones of the program "Què t'hi jugues", of the Chain BE, to value the performance of the referee that according to his opinion, made a mistake the Monday and did him remember it sucedido on 23 March 1980, does almost 41 exact years.

"The of now is not at all compared with the of our times. They removed us a league with a penalti invented, cancelled me a goal, went an armed robbery. The Real Sociedad would have to have a league more", ensured Satrústegui while it sentences that "any mate" of that then thinks of the same form.

Said meeting finished with final marker of 2-2 thanks to a penal pitado by José Luis García Carrión, that was capitalised by Juanito while several white players invaded the area in the collection. That day, could go expelled with merits Juanito, Stielike and Benito, besides goal cancelled to Jesús María.

The doubt does not help

The inclusion of the technology in the football keeps on being slow and little effective, such as we have seen with the VAR, that between lines interpretations and confusions follows leaving in clear evidence to the teams boys when there are doubts, although yes it is true that a lot of errors of the present campaign have solved thanks to this tool whenever it has given him a partial and suitable use.

A line resembled the one who keeps Satrústegui, that finalising with the debate of the Real Madrid, assumes that in front of any doubt "yes, the VAR sand decants by the Madrid. A lot of juagadas have resolved with the videoarbitraje, but many others neither understand ".

The inclusion of the technology in the football keeps on being slow and little effective, such as we have seen with the VAR, that between lines interpretations and confusions follows leaving in clear evidence to the teams boys when there are doubts, although yes it is true that a lot of errors of the present campaign have solved thanks to this tool whenever it has given him a partial and suitable use.

A line resembled the one who keeps Satrústegui, that finalising with the debate of the Real Madrid, assumes that in front of any doubt "yes, the VAR sand decants by the Madrid. A lot of juagadas have resolved with the videoarbitraje, but many others neither understand ".