The jurists of the Barça defend the pact in the case Neymar

The jurist of the FC Barcelona Román Gómez Ponti and the lawyer of the club Critóbal Martell went out in press conference this Wednesday to defend the pact to the that arrived the club by the Case Neymar. According to these, the option of the pact is not something to celebrate but yes the best opportunity that had the club to go out airoso in front of the derivative problems of the signing of the crack Brazilian. Also they referred to the complaint of the ex president Joan Laporta that, according to these, "would have to accuse to the Barça of an already filed crime".

"We come to give objective data, no to convince to anybody", began saying Gómez Ponti. On the pact, left clear that "was not a dish of good taste pose to the club this recommendation of pact, do not go to celebrate at all, but think that is a good solution". The same jurist explains with rotundity that "there has not been compadreo neither 'chalaneo', word that have listened in the street, is not possible, this does not work like this, if a part had denied would not have arrived to an agreement. It can not . Simply we look for the fine the more possible drop".

"The compliance is the anticipate of the trial in the solitude of the dispatch"

It advanced, this yes, that "lto better coverage for the new agreement of Neymar is to do it the simplest possible". The club does not want to go back to have to go through a thing like this. By his part, Cristóbal Martell had to well explain that "it is essential to know what is a compliance. It is not an invention created for this subject, is a procedural instrument that works each day and to all hours in the courts. In a transaction all win and all lose, but this has a distinct soul: the principle of legality. No mercadea at all because our speaker, Fiscalía and Legal profession of the State, is subject at the beginning of legality. The compliance is the anticipate of the trial in the solitude of the dispatch".

"The entity, when it assumes the penalty, does not do it for saving to an ex president. They are not letters that change because the principle of legality prevents it. If it has produced the convergence is by the facts: Sandro Rosell was imputed after the complementary statement of the FC Barcelona in February of 2014. Therefore it falls of the imputación. More complex is the exoneración of Bartomeu. It is not accused neither never went it. In the National High Court posed his imputación by the agreements, but already resolved that it did not have to be imputed because his paper was not notable in the agreements. It produced a juridical doubt. A technical question of final engineer on the taxation of Neymar in his first year. And this yes carried him to be imputed, but the discussion was tributaria, no juridical-penal. They were reasonable postures and therefore it has left to be imputed.

That the Barça has eaten a crime tributario? At the end it imposes the principle of reality. The Agency Tributaria, in spite of the content of the letter, thinks that there is a group of agreements that are mock. The agreement of scouting was difficult to explain, the one of image... Could have a roll in the hay us judicial in this sense and in front of the risk of a fine of 22 millions decide pactar one of 5,5. It is regrettable because the Barça is not exactly a company, there are feelings, but in front of a calculation of possibilities of an upper fine think in the pact. And as already it paid of more in the complementary, now will be necessary to pay 1,6 millions", concluded.

There is not risk of dissolution of the FC Barcelona

"The reincidencia operates on facts made with hindsight of the firm sentence. And they dissolve entities created for delinquir. And this is not the case of the Barça", commented Gómez Ponti that, to his time remembered that "the club has today a map of risks designed that it did not have in 2011 because this political is of 2010: internal controls to avoid infringements".

Finally, they spoke of the case DIS and the complaint of Joan Laporta. Of the first, stand out that "close the subject as it closes now is a good news: if it speaks of wage, the querella of DIS remains wound. What is wage is a firm sentence can not be another thing in another". On Laporta, Martell commented that "I do not go to go in in debate on illustrate barcelonistas because I am lawyer: full stop. But it causes me perplexity from the respect because to accuse to Bartomeu and Rosell it is necessary to recover the crime of the Barça of 2014, that already is filed".